THE DANGER OF ETHNIC POLITICS IN SOUTH SUDAN
THE DANGER OF ETHNIC POLITICS IN SOUTH SUDAN
By: Philemon Daud Tom
One can
conclude the leaders of South Sudan are appointed to divide and loot national
resources that should have been used for infrastructural development to elevate
citizen life expectancy that largely depends on humanitarian compassion. The
journey of former liberators from freedom fighters to the realities of
corruption, resources mismanagement and tribalism governance that become a norm
continues to test the nation’s character and ability to resolve conflict that divided
the people of South Sudan in ethnic line. They deceived South Sudanese for
beautiful slogan of freedom, justice and equality which their behaviours
indicate how they lost direction from freedom fighters ideals to tyranny ethnic
identity governance.
For many decades of struggle and sacrifices
that waged by the people of South Sudan, committed to the ideals of liberation,
freedom, justice, equality and end to racial marginalization against South Sudanese
by then Sudan government in which led to the separation of South Sudan; one
envisioned should be an inclusive place for all its citizens, but Yet, the hope
for independence soon became the nightmare for ethnic divisions, politics of
exclusion, corruption, nepotism, tribalism and lack of strategic political
objectives to transform South Sudan into place to call home. Millions of South
Sudanese lives have been directly or indirectly destroyed by the government
that they supported during the days of liberation struggle in which no one
expected the freedom fighters turned guns on their own people.
As soon as the
former South Sudan freedom fighters assumed positions of power in the newborn
nation, the lines between national expectations and tribal allegiance began to be
fogy. The revolutionary spirit of liberation that once united marginalized
South Sudan communities under a common interest is overshadowed by the
tribalists sectarian interest group. They divided South Sudanese in ethnic
line, promoted police state and destroyed peaceful coexistence by abusing state
power to humiliate their political opponents and target citizens based on
ethnic classifications.
This shift
from a liberation objective to tribalism governance has consequences that
affect social fabric of South Sudanese society. Government institutions that supposed
to serve the national interest have been controlled to serve only the interest of
tribalists and selective ethnic group that weakening the foundation of nation
building. Famous slogan of liberation struggle which chanting “New Sudan
vision” that promised unity, justice, equality and prosperity has become a
symbol of disgrace and nightmare for the people of South Sudan. It is a sad
reality that the political appointments, resource allocation, and even the
administration of justice and key government positions have currently not been
dictated by merit or national interest but more by the dynamics of tribal
affiliation. After independence, expectation was high to build South Sudan that
reflects on democratic governance in which freedom, equality, justice, rule of
law, respect of human right, social and economic development should be the core
values that destroyed by the ethnic elites associated with the state.
The consequences
of ethnic identity government established by the former freedom fighters in
South Sudan, created huge mistrust, political instability, insecurity, internal
displacement and unwanted civil war in a Country whereby tribal elites captured
the state power and target some ethnic groups as revenge for their historical
grievances. The action of cartels in Juba one betrays the sacrifices of South
Sudanese that died for the ideals that united them to fight for the liberation
of South Sudan from old Sudan political marginalization.
To make
South Sudan as an inclusive and better place, political leaders should reconsider
the spirit of dialogue and reconciliation by placing the collective good above
ethnic interests. Genuine dialogue, reconciliation, inclusive governance and
the strengthening of national identity are not mere expectations, they are
necessities for the Country survival and progress. Only by moving beyond the
shadows of tribalism can South Sudan fulfill its original promises to be a
nation where freedom is not a privilege of the few, but the right of all
citizens. Former liberators betrayed expectations of South Sudanese by leading
them from ideals of liberation struggle to politics of ethnic identity
confusions which’s destroying social fabric of society.
The rise of
ethnic governance in South Sudan, shaped by the very freedom fighters once
celebrated for their resilience, is now utter persistent rhetoric of ethnic
targeting. Aftermath of independence, the aspiration was to forge national unity,
equality, and justice as guiding stars for national healing and reconciliation;
yet liberation promise has been steadily collapsed by a descent into politics
of ethnic identity where governance is wielded as an instrument to divide
rather than unite.
The
transition from revolutionary ideals of liberation struggle to sovereign nationhood
was meant to create a new era. However, as former freedom fighters absorbed
power, the boundaries between national interest and tribal allegiance faded.
The government institutions that supposed to become the backbone of an
inclusive democracy, became battlegrounds for ethnic dominance and corruptions.
Political appointments, resource allocations, and the government key positions
have increasingly distributed to ethnic affiliation in which eroding the very
ideals and principles for which so many South Sudanese sacrificed and died.
The
government is now associated with political elites of tribal interest groups
which they have been accused of abusing state power not only to maintain law
and order but to police state and punish political opponents along ethnic
lines.
This
political leadership dynamic in Juba encourages the targeting of some ethnic
groups deemed to be an enemy of the state and execute retribution for perceived
historical grievances that become a tool to reinforce their political ethnic control.
The abuse of power to humiliate political opponents and identification of
citizens through the narrow lens of ethnic classification is a betrayal of the
liberation ideals that South Sudanese sacrificed and voted for separation.
Such policy
of ethnic profile targeting is not merely a political misstep, but it creates
wounds that continues to destroy social fabric of South Sudanese society that undermines
peaceful coexistence, sows’ seeds of mistrust and divisions.
As tribal
elites captured the state power, they perpetuate cycles of violence, insecurity
and instability and implemented ethnic policy to divide communities that were
once stood together in pursuit of total reforms find themselves targeted, isolated,
suspicious, and sometimes openly victimized by the government system that
supposed to protect them.
Danger of
ethicized governance institutions has a huge consequence of creating communities’
violence, instability and insecurity that become threat to state-building, risk
national fragmentation and fear disintegration of the nation. These ethnic
elites captured the state palace and made slogan of “one people and one
nation”, unity and equality as an emblem of disappointment and disgrace.
For South
Sudan to eradicate ethnic politics that captured the state, it must consider radical
reform of the government institutions, detach security sectors from politics,
enact permanent constitution, enforce law and order for justice and
accountability. Genuine reconciliation can only be achieved by dismantling
tribal loyalties and embracing an inclusive national identity.
The distributions
of power, resources management, allocation of positions and governance
institutions must be guided by merit that promote common good for national interests.
Until the government of South Sudan recommits itself to protecting all
citizens, regardless of their tribe’s background, the path to lasting peace and
prosperity will remain the struggle.
Only by dismantling the structures of ethnic politics and fostering
genuine politics of inclusion which make every South Sudanese have the right to
pursue opportunities without privilege of uncles’ recommendations.
Comments
Post a Comment